Main Discussion Area > English Warbow

Flatbows found on the Mary Rose?

<< < (7/11) > >>

Phil Rees:

--- Quote from: Jaro on December 16, 2010, 08:30:26 am ---Horace I know its "Schrodinger´s cat" . Obviously that was a pun on similar thought experiment.

"I have to admit, I find it a little unusual  and disappointing that this information hasn't been submitted to a journal for peer review scrutiny"

Obviously it will be published when MR trust thinks its proper , since they pay for the testing. Regardless - You can log onto EWBS site and ask directly Mark Stretton (if you find me oh so untrustworthy) directly, who gave him the information.

Let me point out that the information about whitewood bows, even though rebuked from official source floats around since like 1979 or when the first book came out, yet the research proving that, wasnt published in journal for peer review either.  Rather longer period of time isnt it? Why wasnt the "whitewood" bow at least photographed - many many others were.

Jaro

--- End quote ---

You forgot to mention who the authors of the research results are

markinengland:
Horace,

Yes, that's the lecture I was talking about. Glad to know that I'm not making this up, even if I did get some of the names wrong!

Jaro,

I think this is in danger of becoming personal - I hope it doesn't.

There are a number of references to some or a few of the MR bows not being yew. What they are I don't know as this has never been confirmed.  The fact that reference was made at this lecture to non-yew MT bows was reported by me, and now confirmed by Horace. I put this fact forward because I thought it may be of interest . Why the knowledge of this is patchy I do not know - but I would rather not be attacked for putting this information forward. I have no investment in it being correct or incorrect.

I am of course aware that a lot of work has been done on better understanding the MR bows in the past five years. That doesn't necessarily alter the fact that 5 years ago some of the bows were not thought to be yew - and that is presumably still the case. Until such time as more information is available on these particulalr bows that's all that can really be said - some of the MR bows may not be yew. It would be of considerable interest to identify which specific bows were in question and to clarify this.

I'm not sure what you mean by shiny mirrors. I in no way intend to deny or belittle your expertise and knowledge. I do however wish you did not so easily discount the opinions of some others which may also be valid. If Robert Hardy, after living with these bows for so long thought that a few were not yew, I'd like to know why rather than just discount a possibly fascinating bit of knowledge. I am sure that he has made mistakes and have no doubt he has learnt a great deal during his lifelong interest in longbows. Perhaps he's correct, perhaps not - but why attack so hard when someone reports this?

My mind may be an odd shape - but is that relevant? The people who have said that they feel that not all the bows were yew must presumably have had what appeared to them at the time to be a good reason for beleiving this and saying this. I don't agree or disagree with what they say - I would like to know why they said this, what it was based upon and see work to establish whether it is correct or not. Perhaps there is a language barrier at work but I feel you are getting dangerously close to personal insults which I do not appreciate.

You do keep on referring to these bows as being whitewood. They may not be whitewood, they could be on New World wood. What they are is not known. All that is known is that those who had access to the MR bows at that time thought that some of them were not yew.

"The whole affair is like "accusing me that I cannot be scientist because I dont worship on altar of Rodenberry". Bizzare." Jaro, I'm afraid that I just did not understand this, simple corkscrew-brain shiny mirror person that I am  ;D I accuse you of nothing. Why shoot the messenger? I don't care if you believe or don't believe this about MR bows I just reported something I felt might be of interest.

Bizarre Mark with corkscrew brain and shiny mirror in England  ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)

Pat B:
I won't allow it to get personal here on PA!!!   >:(   ;)

Phil Rees:
Jaro
Would you be kind enough to clarify what is your relationship with and to the Mary Rose Trust?

backgardenbowyer:
I really hope this doesn't get personal - because like so many others I would genuinely like to know if some of the MR bows were not yew.  I've heard this said several times and denied several times.  The truth is that so far as I know no comprehensive study cataloguing all the bows has been published.  I think it is about time we in the archery community had such a comprehensive study available - and I'm a little surprised that it hasn't been done.  It would be very interesting to see statistical analyses of the measurements of the full range of bows cross referenced to the places they were found on the site so that we could see if any groups or categories seem to emerge perhaps suggesting different types of bows for different purposes.  I don't know what would be involved in scientifically analysing the wood species of all the bows - but subject to the levels of preservation it must be possible and and surely could have been done by now.  There are very clear historical records that whitewood longbows were made in the middle ages.  Whether there were any on the MR and whether they were accepted as serviceable for war is a different matter.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page