Main Discussion Area > English Warbow

Starting dimensions for yew warbow

<< < (8/8)

mikekeswick:

--- Quote from: WillS on July 11, 2016, 09:52:06 am ---I think it's more the fact that a bow tillered to 150lb at 30" is far less stressed than a bow tillered to 150lb at 32".  The wood stays healthier, therefore the performance is better.

I suppose when somebody decides to document it, or do some extensive testing we'll know for sure.

--- End quote ---

If you make the 32 inch draw bow a wee bit wider or longer it isn't more strained. The aim on all bows should be to make them feel the correct strain for the wood at full draw. Be that 30# 50# or 150#. Wood doesn't know what bow/design it is in  - it just feels the strain upto its limits then fails if we push it past.
A longer draw on the same bow/same arrow makes it more efficient.

Del the cat:

--- Quote from: poplar600 on July 16, 2016, 11:04:31 pm ---Why do these bows have such a long parallel section, and then a sudden extreme taper at the tips?

That's how it looks to me anyways

--- End quote ---
Parallel, because they are narrow to start with, and if you go too narrow too quick they can bend sideways. The thickness tapers so the width doesn't need too.
They taper quickly and gracefully at the tip because they can, and it saves weight. I see very few bows that couldn't actually be thinner at the tip. I see plenty where they look like pencils at the end, where the horn nock has been fitted but there has been no attempt to blend that into the limb. Bear in mind you are going from a circular section at the nock to a D section in the limb, if it's not done nicely it looks hideous!
Here's a post that shows what I mean...
http://bowyersdiary.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/back-patch-and-tip-tidy.html
Del

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page

Go to full version