Main Discussion Area > Flintknapping
Flintknapping Video Cut Tine Tip Antler Flaking
AncientTech:
--- Quote from: Ghost Knapper on April 17, 2016, 08:53:02 am ---
--- Quote ---This video is currently going around the world, through Facebook. I am getting a lot of feedback from people over in Europe. A German person pointed out that the technique shown here was shown on an old black and white clip from the Amazon jungle. According to the individual, the arrowhead making process was exactly the same, in the clip. I never showed this to anyone, before.
--- End quote ---
Not to be quarrelsome but this video you linked to you stated was exactly the same as an old black and white clip from the Amazon. If it is exactly the same instead of modifying the technique (switching to a hafted antler hammer) why not stick with it and become more proficient?
--- End quote ---
I did not speak with the German. But, I believe that he meant that the indian was making an arrowhead in exactly the SAME WAY. As you can see, this is a distinct process. He did not say that the tools are "exactly" identical to my tools. And, even if he did say that, it does not detract from the fact that there is plenty of evidence to support that Native Americans used specialized flintnapping hammers - made from antler - used in conjunction with indirect percussion flintknapping processes.
Also, I do not know for a fact that the hammer will be better, because I have not yet tested it. But, I do need a sort of re-bounding blow, when there is some play in the process, to get a good flaking effect. And, after watching my own video, I concluded that I may be able to create a better type of blow, while using a small antler mallet, not unlike the the antler mallets that have been recovered from archaeological sites, for the last hundred years.
I hope this makes things clearer.
Ghost Knapper:
Makes sense. Can you put some links to the specialized flintknapping hammers? I have never come across any archaeological evidence for the antler mallets, but then again I haven't looked that hard.
nclonghunter:
I wonder how many will mash a finger this week trying this >:D. Thanks for posting Ben. I believe several references I read have mentioned holding the point in a piece of leather to protect the hand. I wonder if it also aids in holding the point more firmly in the grip. I will be giving it a try also...
Here is an interesting clip on youtube of a similar technique. I mention similar because it looks like he is striking the end rather than in the palm: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CfQUFERvPxI
Hummingbird Point:
Also, I do not know for a fact that the hammer will be better, because I have not yet tested it. But, I do need a sort of re-bounding blow, when there is some play in the process, to get a good flaking effect. And, after watching my own video, I concluded that I may be able to create a better type of blow, while using a small antler mallet, not unlike the the antler mallets that have been recovered from archaeological sites, for the last hundred years.
Ben,
For the small tine horizontal punching I have been alternately using an elk hammer and a dogwood hammer, both about 1.25" diameter on a 10",fairly lightweight handle. They do seem to work better than a baton, more power, more accuracy and easier to get the rhyme going, at least for me. I haven't noticed any difference between the antler and the wood on how the flakes run, which isn't to say there isn't one, just that I haven't picked up on it. So any way, I think it is worth your time to try it.
Keith
[/quote]
AncientTech:
--- Quote from: Ghost Knapper on April 17, 2016, 04:02:20 pm ---Makes sense. Can you put some links to the specialized flintknapping hammers? I have never come across any archaeological evidence for the antler mallets, but then again I haven't looked that hard.
--- End quote ---
You can probably find them by searching museum collections, online. The hammers frequently have a hole drilled through the head. My understanding is that there was another hole in the end of the handle. The head was placed on top of the handle, and then lashed through two holes.
Here is where my deductive reasoning kicks in. If antler hammers that are struck on sharp flint edges show cuts, chewing, and other such wear, but antler hammers that are only used to strike other pieces of antler do not show any such markings, and the antler hammers that are known from archaeological contexts, do not show any such marking, then shouldn't we be able to hypothetically rule out the direct use on flint? And, isn't there some possibility that such hammers could have been used on other known flintknapping tools, such as antler flakers?
So, that is how I look at the subject. If my theory is right, then all of these antler hammers that go back to the advent of the archaic era, and that do not show any harsh markings, may actually be indirect evidence of sophisticated indirect percussion flintknapping practices. Of course, I am not saying that "it was", because I was not there. But, if my theory is correct then it could revolutionize how antler flakers are studied.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version