Main Discussion Area > Bows

How far, how fast?

<< < (5/7) > >>

StickMark:
35 pounds
Set: 1.25"; 0.75"
I underbuilt.

And I think it just was a slightly weak piece

WhistlingBadger:

--- Quote from: sleek on July 01, 2024, 09:14:50 pm ---
Example: 
Wood type: Balsa
Nock to nock 62 inches
8 inch handle
6 inch stiff tips
1.5 inches wide at the fade for 3 inches past the fade
1.25 inches wide at 4 inches past the fade
Even taper to .5 inches wide 18 inches from fade
6 inch Stiff tips after 18 inches

--- End quote ---

Thanks for this offer, Sleek!!  I can't take you up on it as I don't have any self-bows in the pipeline at the moment--I'm experimenting with sinew and dogbane backings on all my current projects.  But now I feel this weird emotional need for someone to build a 62", balsa wood bow with an 8" handle and 6" levers...

sleek:

--- Quote from: StickMark on July 03, 2024, 11:06:30 am ---35 pounds
Set: 1.25"; 0.75"
I underbuilt.

And I think it just was a slightly weak piece

--- End quote ---

If you drop the 23% of white oaks range, 23% of 45 pounds is 34 pounds. White oak has such a huge range from essentially a rubber tree all the way to stout as osage, it would require a test of that wood to know what to expect. Also did you heat treat the bow? White woods soak moisture like a sponge and moisture content in any bow will cause set. If you haven't heat treated it, perhaps try that and let me know if that makes the difference?

Like I said, this is a learning experience and I'd not considered that a single species would vary over 60% within its own species. For example, is density ranges from .55 to .83, a 66% difference.

StickMark:
Heat treated the heck out of it.
But, this build i attempted to try the tracing method. Outlining on paper.  (1.25 set is on bottom limb. I string it w step through method.)
I went too ⁷far with sanding, those dreaded adjustments that i do at the end; your observation of underbuilding comes in play here, as leaving more wood to handle the final adjustments would have given me 43, 45 #.
I have a piece from same board, shorter by 8 ".
I am going to finish it today, but leave it much "stouter" in build: semi bendy handle, but wider. Will heat treat through out build, and get back w results.

sleek:

--- Quote from: StickMark on July 03, 2024, 02:30:55 pm ---Heat treated the heck out of it.
But, this build i attempted to try the tracing method. Outlining on paper.  (1.25 set is on bottom limb. I string it w step through method.)
I went too ⁷far with sanding, those dreaded adjustments that i do at the end; your observation of underbuilding comes in play here, as leaving more wood to handle the final adjustments would have given me 43, 45 #.
I have a piece from same board, shorter by 8 ".
I am going to finish it today, but leave it much "stouter" in build: semi bendy handle, but wider. Will heat treat through out build, and get back w results.

--- End quote ---

How a bow is handled over its life will case set  I can't account for, such as the step through method over stressing the lower limb like you mentioned. This method I'm using is good for a fresh dry bow, that won't take set under normal conditions.

Your next bow being 8 " shorter will stress it more,  You will need more width through more of the bow to compensate 

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version