Author Topic: Short staves- draw length and draw weight trade off  (Read 583 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline jameswoodmot

  • Member
  • Posts: 117
Re: Short staves- draw length and draw weight trade off
« Reply #15 on: January 13, 2026, 10:34:55 am »
Well, that didn’t last long! I’ve been trying to get this gas burner heat treating method sorted but it’s being a real pain. There are so many variable to getting it set up I’m finding it hard to work out how long to cook stuff. Also, with small diameter staves there is that gap where the back can get cooked.

I started with these western red cedar slats. Smelt like a sauna until it smelt like a burning sauna. They didn’t last long.

I had the burner on the ground and then realised at ground level there are all sorts of gusts and breezes blowing the glaze around.

Then I lifted the whole thing up and balanced it on various things. (Which is what I was trying to avoid) and then it worked better.

Then I cooked it all the way through!

Ive decrowned it as I wanted to see if it was the hot air getting to the back or if it was cooked through and it looks like a combination of both.

Just cooking the other limb to match now.

I’ll back it, options are; Ash, bamboo, sinew. What do you reckon?don’t think the bamboo will work without deflexing it in the middle.

The last photo is of the decrowned back
. The photo of the burner is just when I set it up, it was about 6” away in the end

I’ll get this thing sorted one day. I think I need a larger burner with more hole, there or four rows, and less flame per each hole.

Offline jameswoodmot

  • Member
  • Posts: 117
Re: Short staves- draw length and draw weight trade off
« Reply #16 on: January 13, 2026, 12:16:21 pm »
Couldn’t help myself, got a slat of black locust cut and planed. Any reason that’s a terrible idea?

I’ve also cut another piece of elm, a little shorter than the original, to continue with the plan. I’ll just not be heat treating it with gas 😂

Offline jameswoodmot

  • Member
  • Posts: 117
Re: Short staves- draw length and draw weight trade off
« Reply #17 on: January 13, 2026, 01:11:45 pm »
Too slow I did it anyway


One heat treated elm/ black locust stave.

I’m have zero investment in this, I might work but I’m not 100% about the backing strip, got a pin knot in it that I didn’t realise until I was flexing up was on the back side of the strip not the belly side as I had intended for it to be. Just got mixed up.
Glueing with cascamite and I scraped the mating surfaces with a hacksaw blade.

I use silicon spray on the bed of the thickness planer, I ran the glue surface over the belt sander and then scraped and then cleaned with isopropyl. Silicone spray is possible the worst thing for a glue joint so I hope I got it all!

The new elm stave is going to need some work to get it straight



Offline sleek

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 7,246
Re: Short staves- draw length and draw weight trade off
« Reply #18 on: January 13, 2026, 02:21:47 pm »
Elm makes some of the best bows. Its not a common wood only because of the Dutch elm disease.  Its has an interlocking grain so id wager it makes a fine backing. That silicone spray may be the death of this though, as once its on, nothing removes it. It coats sandpaper when you try to sand it off, only making you grind it deeper into the wood. Perhaps a scraper can scrape off the layer the silicone is one to remove it all the way. Im watching with interest.
Tread softly and carry a bent stick.

Dont seek your happiness through the approval of others

Offline jameswoodmot

  • Member
  • Posts: 117
Re: Short staves- draw length and draw weight trade off
« Reply #19 on: January 13, 2026, 04:01:46 pm »
Fingers crossed. Good job I have a lot of faith in cascamite. I used a 24 grit 2.5 meter long belt so it’s a lot of abrasive surface area and very aggressive. The bits that come off are more like saw dust than sanding dust, I think I got it off.

It’s got a stupid amount of reflex, I ended up with more than I expected in the elm stave, and I expected the bl backing to straighten it out when I glued it up but it didn’t much at all

If I can get 30lb at 20” I’ll be very happy with it. Then I’ll probably get too over confident and break it 😂

Offline superdav95

  • Member
  • Posts: 2,365
  • 3432614095
Re: Short staves- draw length and draw weight trade off
« Reply #20 on: January 13, 2026, 06:06:52 pm »
Yao could have saved you some trouble going down the rabbit hole of gas burners.  Too bad.  They didn’t work well for me either.  The only things that ended up working for me was a good heat gun which take a lot of time even if you build a holder, and a hot coal bed.  The coal bed is the best in my opinion to get a thorough cook.  You will benefit from protecting your back with a heat resistant material like insulation or insulating foil perhaps.  I used a roll of pink insulation layer out on sticky foil tape that worked.  I’ve since moved to roxul the green stuff held in a strip with foil tape and then weight that down as is cooks.  I find it doesn’t send glass fiber floaties around in the air like the pink stuff does.  Anyway some thing to consider for next time.  I also don’t heat treat woods like western or eastern cedars or junipers or yew really.  At least not the same as we would with white woods.  If doing corrections in twist or alignment fixes use steam. It will make the corrections more safe and drastically reduce your splinter lifts or breaks if done right.  Overheating can cause wood to become too brittle and snap.  White woods generally take more heat better the other woods even Osage.  So long as you take measures to avoid too much wrap around heat effect on the stave white woods can tolerate a lot.  I’ve got many hhb, hickory, elm and others in white wood category that have taken darker then normal heat cook over coals and been great shooters.  Even bamboo is a great candidate for heat treatment.  I know a lot of guys don’t do this but for me I’ve found some noticeable benefit from doing it.  If using bamboo for backing only heat treatment on the non rind side.  Especially for backing.  If using a bamboo backed and bellied bow then there is benefit to doing a treatment on the compression belly side boo only.  Some of my fastest bow have been these ones.  Anyway lots of info here on the forum.  Do some searches I’m sure you’ll see some good examples to give you a good reference.  Message me directly too if you like. superdav95@gmail.com
Sticks and stones and other poky stabby things.

superdav95@gmail.com

Offline sleek

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 7,246
Re: Short staves- draw length and draw weight trade off
« Reply #21 on: Today at 03:12:03 pm »
Sleek, I've got 57" of Wych Elm cut, 1 1/2" at the handle and 1 1/4" at the tips for now, i will potentially have 3" or so of flipped stiff tip. Do you need more info for your calculations?

We'll see how it does but what i'll probaby do if im patient enough is to tiller it to 18" or so and then start taking chrono reading. IF im patient and dillegent enough i think the arrow speed will start to plateau before its starts to drop? Im going to heat treat it though so as I scrape through the heat treated wood and then potentially re heat treat it that might render the reults inaccurate as far as future bows?

If it doesnt seem to be able to take the bend early on i'll sinew it as you suggest Supedav as a practice for that little yew stave.

Selfbowman, i've got plenty of long staves, I just fancy making a short bow


Thanks for all the input everyone, im starting to get my head round this wood bending! certaily is complex

I need to know the dimensions of the working ( bending section) limb so I can calculate its surface area. For example, the bow is 1.5 at the fades, and 1 inch mid limb, tapering evenly to .5 where the tips get stiff, and the limb from fade to where the tip stops bending is 27 inches.
Tread softly and carry a bent stick.

Dont seek your happiness through the approval of others

Offline jameswoodmot

  • Member
  • Posts: 117
Re: Short staves- draw length and draw weight trade off
« Reply #22 on: Today at 03:38:38 pm »
I’ll get back to you both properly in the near future.


For now, we have a resurrection 😎