Primitive Archer

Main Discussion Area => Arrows => Topic started by: stringstretcher on January 09, 2008, 09:47:42 pm

Title: wooden shaft users?
Post by: stringstretcher on January 09, 2008, 09:47:42 pm
I have lots of cedar and other wood shaft that are just way to heavy for me to use. How many of you shoot just parrallel shafts,how many shoot nock tapered shafts, and how many of you shoot a barrell tapered shaft. Of the two tapered shafts which one works best and why?
Title: Re: wooden shaft users?
Post by: Justin Snyder on January 09, 2008, 10:02:28 pm
Most of my arrows are parallel shafts.  I do have a few cane and a shoot shafts.  I believe the weight forward of tapered shafts are probably better, just never made any.  Justin
Title: Re: wooden shaft users?
Post by: Pappy on January 10, 2008, 06:15:46 am
I shoot mostly parellel shafts also,but I am working on some nock tappered shafts and if I ever get them finished I will let you know,I think they will work good. :)
   Pappy
Title: Re: wooden shaft users?
Post by: Pat B on January 10, 2008, 10:04:16 am
I use hardwood shoots and cane for arrows and both are naturally tapered. This taper makes then less spine sensitive. With the naturally tapered shafts you can reduce the spine by as much as 10#. Barrel tapering reduces physical weight but allows spine weight to remain high.        Pat
Title: Re: wooden shaft users?
Post by: 1/2primitive on January 10, 2008, 10:36:01 pm
Same as Pat, I use shoots and cane/bamboo.
Now that I come to think of it, I haven't had a whole lot of trouble with the spine on my bamboo shafts, only on the arrows I made from dowels. I guess the tapering from point to nock does help.
     Sean
Title: Re: wooden shaft users?
Post by: The Singing Bowyer on January 10, 2008, 11:25:48 pm
I taper the nock end, and have found I get a more consistent group and better flight---on the days when i can shoot, anyway.... ;)
Title: Re: wooden shaft users?
Post by: Glenn R. on January 11, 2008, 08:38:00 pm
I use nock taper shafts when hunting and most of my shooting. The latest issue of TBM had a great article on just such subject----I believe it was said nock tapered shafts had 8  or 9 ? percent better penetration than parallels and that nock taper had 18 ? percent better penetration than barrel tapered----something like that--don't have my mag. handy.  I have always found nock taper to fly better/ cleaner and quieter off the longbow handle.
Title: Re: wooden shaft users?
Post by: BigWapiti on January 13, 2008, 12:46:20 am
Sorry, but nock taper? - Does this mean it tapers from the nock to the point, or vice versa?
Title: Re: wooden shaft users?
Post by: DanaM on January 13, 2008, 06:44:45 am
Sorry, but nock taper? - Does this mean it tapers from the nock to the point, or vice versa?

YUP, like a shoot shaft or cane does naturally
Title: Re: wooden shaft users?
Post by: BigWapiti on January 13, 2008, 01:01:23 pm
Thanks DanaM - just only had my first sip of coffee - so bear w/ me...   So the thick end is at the nock, right?

Trying to remember back to what I have read, do a lot of folks also suggest thick end at the tip too?  OR, is it that they use the "bottom" end (closest to ground) for the tip, and taper it appropriately (nock taper, etc)?  Is the ground end more dense so adds punch power to the arrow?
Title: Re: wooden shaft users?
Post by: DanaM on January 13, 2008, 02:09:32 pm
Thick end is point, narrow end is nock. So you get a tapered shaft that is weight forward.
Title: Re: wooden shaft users?
Post by: Glenn R. on January 13, 2008, 02:30:35 pm
On most nock taper cedar shafts the taper begins about 10" forward of the nock, lets say on a 11/32 shaft--then gradually tapers down to the nock itself allowing the use of a 5/32 nock----instead of 11/32.     Same situation with 23/64 shaft, 10" forward of nock and gradually tapered down to a 11/32 nock.  The 'grizzly' carbon wrapped arrows are made with a full length taper from point(lrg.) to nock(sml.)     What I've been told over the years is that you will see more of an advantage shooting tapered arrows off of a longbow because of its lack of cut-out(centershot) whereas less advantage will be seen by a recurve because of the deep cut-out/shelf (closer to centershot).  Less that the arrow has to bend to clear the riser. At least thats the wat its suppose to work :)
Title: Re: wooden shaft users?
Post by: PeteC on January 19, 2008, 10:25:58 pm
I make a lot of shoot arrows from privet hedge .It's very common ,and downright tough.But it's very heavy.So I will nock taper most shafts with a sharp piece of flint,or if I have one that needs to be lightened a tad more,I'll barrel taper it.That way I can usually get the shafts around 11-12 grains per pound draw weight,(total arrow weight),and they're easy to make . God Bless ,  PeteC
Title: Re: wooden shaft users?
Post by: PeteC on January 20, 2008, 10:47:06 pm
Stringstretcher,did you get my e-mail? With this contraption I never know if what I send goes where it's suppose to. God Bless, PeteC
Title: Re: wooden shaft users?
Post by: stringstretcher on January 21, 2008, 01:11:31 am
No Pete I sure did not.  Sent you a pm.  Bowjock@verizon.net
Title: Re: wooden shaft users?
Post by: uwe on January 21, 2008, 03:10:49 pm
I use parallel shafts, but they get a little less. I turned to shoots of hazel and dogwood. Now I make my own shafts from cane or is a bamboo? There are too many bamboosort out, so that I can`t which it is. But I can say they are very reliable in straightness, durability and what I prefer very much, there is no spineproblem to be looked for.
Title: Re: wooden shaft users?
Post by: PeteC on January 23, 2008, 11:18:03 pm
Charles,you should get my E-mail now.I did send it to the wrong address.Me and these computers. God Bless
Title: Re: wooden shaft users?
Post by: stringstretcher on January 23, 2008, 11:46:56 pm
got it and thanks for the info.  Now all I have to do is look for another few year to find some of this......lol....what a journey
Title: Re: wooden shaft users?
Post by: daniel on January 30, 2008, 06:35:03 am
I only shot tapered arrows, even though can't really see the difference with my recurve, with longbow hawever they're much better than parallel shafts;
I would start with parallel cedars, lets say 23/64 and 70-74 spine, get tham really straight, than I would put stain on the nock end of the shaft (7"or so)
using small block plane, I would taper the shaft to make stain dissappear,
instead of calipers, I controll the thickness of the shaft with guides for Tru-Center taper tool
I would finish with 80-100-150-220 sandpaper and #00-0000 steal wool
from my experience shaft looses about 2-3# of spine, but that's ok (You can use lighter point, without altering FOC much)
entire arrow will be about 20-30grains lighter, than parallel shaft from the same set and will fly like a dart
Title: Re: wooden shaft users?
Post by: JackCrafty on January 30, 2008, 02:22:04 pm
I've shot mostly parallel shafts while hunting.  But as a kid I shot shoot shafts with the big end at the nock...tapering to a thinner tip.  I did this mainly because I split the nock end to insert my fletching.  The "skinny" end wouldn't split as consistently as the "fat" end.

Anyway, now that I'm making arrows similar to NA designs, I'm shooting barrelled shafts.  I still tend to favor an arrow that is "fatter" under the feathers but I don't know why this works better for me.  Maybe it's because of the the way I realease the arrow?  I've been known to the quite "ungraceful".

As far as penetration of the arrow into the target, I've found that if the target is soft a "skinny" tip works MUCH better.  It also works better on targets with a thin, hard, skin.  I've got holes in my hardy-plank shed to prove it (I gave up using the shed as a backdrop).  Amazing what a wooden tip can do.....