Primitive Archer

Main Discussion Area => Bows => Topic started by: Justin Snyder on May 18, 2007, 02:29:52 am

Title: Walnut & hackberry
Post by: Justin Snyder on May 18, 2007, 02:29:52 am
I think Pappy told me this when I was in Tennessee, but I cant remember.  Do you use the sapwood on walnut and hackberry?  Anyone ever use the heartwood of either?  Justin
Title: Re: Walnut & hackberry
Post by: Badger on May 18, 2007, 02:55:28 am
    Walnut the sapwood is preferable but looks great with a sapwood back and heartwood belly. Hackberry you can use any part of the wood starting right under the bark, hackberry is the most bendable of all american woods if you want to get fancy and make some recurves, you can bend it into circles with a little steam. Steve
Title: Re: Walnut & hackberry
Post by: Coo-wah-chobee on May 18, 2007, 03:34:52 am
                        Tough to get walnut(black) here. Most are cut down and sold for furniture. Had a small piece once didnt have much heartwood so I used sapwood. Was ok bow,IMHO eh ! Hackberry is in elm family but theres a coupla species, one is good one is not so good. Made one from sap n heartwood once, was a really nice hard hitting bow, JUstin...............bob
Title: Re: Walnut & hackberry
Post by: Pappy on May 18, 2007, 06:06:06 am
What Badger said.You really have to keep Hackberry dry,kind of like you would treat Hickory
and tiller carefully it will get away from you fast.Exercise a lot between scraping before you move on. :)
   Pappy
Title: Re: Walnut & hackberry
Post by: GregB on May 18, 2007, 08:36:38 am
I've only made one hackberry bow, but it turned out nice. It is really light in physical weight in your hand. Make sure you cut the limb thickness prior to floor tillering a little thicker then you would for osage or hickory. A finished hackberry bow 1-1/2" wide of a specific length and draw weight will be thicker with the finished bow then the same width osage or hickory bow of the same length and draw weight. At least that was my experience with the one I made.

So start out thick, and take it slow. Exercise the limbs a lot between scrappings like Pappy said. ;)
Title: Re: Walnut & hackberry
Post by: jcougar on May 18, 2007, 10:18:25 am
I've had good luck with hackberry and bad luck with walnut sapwood.  Hackberry makes a real nice bow, just don't go too fast in the tillering process or you'll end up with half the weight you wanted. 
Title: Re: Walnut & hackberry
Post by: snedeker on May 18, 2007, 10:21:09 am
I made a nice one from walnut heart lumber backed with maple.   hackberry is the standard white wood deal where the sapwood is where its at.

Dave
Title: Re: Walnut & hackberry
Post by: Justin Snyder on May 18, 2007, 10:43:57 am
Thanks guys, I think I will split the Hackberry to make some all sapwood and some 50/50 bows.  We didn't get a real consensus on the walnut,  :'( any more thoughts. 
Pappy, I think I can manage dry.  ;D It has been in the mid 90s all week and hasn't rained since before I came to Tennessee.     Justin
Title: Re: Walnut & hackberry
Post by: Pat B on May 18, 2007, 10:44:23 am
I have never used Hackberry but I have made nice bow with BW sapwood...usually overbuilt. I did make an ELB style hickory backed BW that ended up fretting badly after a few shots.
   You have enough sapwood to get 2 or 3 piggy backs from that BW log.   Pat
Title: Re: Walnut & hackberry
Post by: tom sawyer on May 18, 2007, 11:00:15 am
I also made a decent hickory-backed walnut heartwood bow (1/4-sawn).  So the heartwood will work at least as a belly.  Around here the walnut has pretty thick sapwood so if you were using under the bark as your back, you'd probably have an all-sapwood bow.  I don't know how it is to chase a ring, because the stuff is semi-ring porous so it will be a little different to try and follow a ring.
Title: Re: Walnut & hackberry
Post by: Badger on May 18, 2007, 12:44:05 pm
       Justin, all the trees in the hickory family inculding walnut are recomended to use sapwood, may of them work well either way though, Steve
Title: Re: Walnut & hackberry
Post by: Justin Snyder on May 18, 2007, 02:47:55 pm
Thanks guys, I really appreciate all the input.  I guess asking if the hackberry is sapwood is kind of silly. I have it all split up and I cant see that there is any heartwood in the log.  It is just one continuous white wood all the way from the bark to the core.  Maybe after it dries a little I will be able to tell the difference.  My camera battery is dead, so I will post some pictures tonight.  Justin
Title: Re: Walnut & hackberry
Post by: tom sawyer on May 18, 2007, 03:58:29 pm
Yeah its pretty white all the way through.  How did that big boy split anyway?  Have to use quite a few wedges or did it pop open easy for you?
Title: Re: Walnut & hackberry
Post by: Pat B on May 18, 2007, 04:51:38 pm
Lennie, With the dry conditions where Justin lives I'm surprised those logs didn't just pop open trying to get rid of the moisture. ;D
Justin. How many staves did you get out of the load?   Pat
Title: Re: Walnut & hackberry
Post by: Justin Snyder on May 18, 2007, 06:24:52 pm
Lennie, it split beautiful. When Ron and I split it in half we were giggling like school girls because it went so easy.  I drove one of Pappy's big wedges in it and it cracked the entire 8'+  with the first wedge.  It did have a few stringers, but went pretty good.  After I got it home and unloaded the halves and let them sit for a while it was basically the same.  After I got half way on the walnut, it POPPED. Sounded like a giant bow exploding.  The bark on the walnut pulled off in huge sheets too. 

Pat, I haven't reduced it to single staves yet. I have only split each piece into 8 pieces. I expect I can get about 3 staves from each piece, (don't get greedy) so about 24 staves for the hackberry.  2 all sapwood staves per piece with the walnut and 1 50/50 sapwood heartwood per piece.  Ill count the staves and post some pictures tonight.  This of course is staves from 6 1/2' to 8' long.  ;D It does not include the billets from the branches.   Justin
Title: Re: Walnut & hackberry
Post by: Pat B on May 19, 2007, 01:02:32 am
Yea! you are better leaving it in big chunks for a while to insure straight staves. I guess you used quite a bit of Elmer's covering the naked backs.  ;D  Pat
Title: Re: Walnut & hackberry
Post by: GregB on May 19, 2007, 09:39:01 pm

I don't think those logs had much choice but to split easily with Justin "Bunyun" Snyder whacking on them! ;D
Title: Re: Walnut & hackberry
Post by: Justin Snyder on May 19, 2007, 09:55:41 pm
How do you know I have bunions. I wasn't running around barefoot at Pappy's.  Justin
Title: Re: Walnut & hackberry
Post by: jkekoni on May 22, 2007, 08:11:47 am
Hackberry <Celtis > is <Cannabaceae> not <Ulmacae>.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hackberry
Title: Re: Walnut & hackberry
Post by: Coo-wah-chobee on May 22, 2007, 10:21:36 am
 Hackberry was placed in either family. Just recently powers that be decided it should be in Cannabaceae family not Ulmacae(elm) Wonder how long this will last ?.............bob
Title: Re: Walnut & hackberry
Post by: Justin Snyder on May 22, 2007, 12:54:17 pm
Bob, I think the (experts) are just trying to make us even more confused about if we are dealing with the same trees as others are talking about.  ;D Justin
Title: Re: Walnut & hackberry
Post by: Hillbilly on May 22, 2007, 12:58:47 pm
Yeah, I love all the recent taxonomical changes-splitting genuses, splitting and changing families, and changing species names. It was enough fun learning the Latin names for plants the first time, much less changing them every few years.
Title: Re: Walnut & hackberry
Post by: Justin Snyder on May 22, 2007, 01:32:25 pm
Job security for the guys that do the naming. Justin
Title: Re: Walnut & hackberry
Post by: jkekoni on May 23, 2007, 08:21:47 am
We have DNA tests today.
So we will put plants in the taxons based on facts, not opinions like before.
(Am I correct in this one?).

BTW. It is legal to dry the wood regardless of its taxon.  :o

No It is not the experts who are trying to confuse. They are trying to make order.

It is the markiting people who invent misleading (Lemonwood  ), ambigious ( Mountain ash) and plain wrong trade names (Sapele Mahogany and Brazilian wahlnut).
Title: Re: Walnut & hackberry
Post by: snedeker on May 23, 2007, 12:24:31 pm
 8)
Title: Re: Walnut & hackberry
Post by: Calendargirl on May 24, 2007, 05:04:16 pm
Justin
volume 4 issue 3 is the one that has the article on black walnut longbow by T.J. Newman if I have everything down correctly.  The Hackberry article was a Zimmerman one so I am assuming it was medicinal not about bow making....where did you get all that wood anyway?  Only from someone really really WONDERFUL... ;D
Title: Re: Walnut & hackberry
Post by: Justin Snyder on May 24, 2007, 06:19:27 pm
YES SOMEONE WONDERFULL. Well that is to say someone wonderfull helped me to get it.  Thanks Knothead,  ;D ;D Justin
Title: Re: Walnut & hackberry
Post by: Justin Snyder on May 24, 2007, 09:20:28 pm
I just thought I would give you an update.  I stripped the bark off of some of the wood and left it on others. I sealed the ends on everything. Those with the bark on are fine. Those with the back sealed are fine.  The walnut with the back not sealed is fine, but the hackberry with the back not sealed checked all to pieces.  Of course I have them in my hotbox, (outside).  ;D I think the hickory bows I was working on at the classic should be plenty dry now.  It is 86* and overcast, but the humidity is only 11%.  Ill bet Greg cant even do that in a hotbox.  ;D Justin
Title: Re: Walnut & hackberry
Post by: Coo-wah-chobee on May 24, 2007, 10:01:30 pm
       UHHH-wanna bet ? ;D ;D ;D ;D...........bob