Author Topic: My first modified Holmegaard  (Read 6484 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Little John

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,709
Re: My first modified Holmegaard
« Reply #15 on: September 29, 2009, 11:29:52 pm »
Joe, the outer limbs may or may not bee to thick, what I like is how narrow they are. That is how to make them light, Jim Hamm says to thin the outer limbs till they just barley begin to bend at full draw, you can use a short straight edge to check it. But like you say use it as is and there is always the next one.  Good luck on the hunt.   Kenneth
« Last Edit: September 30, 2009, 12:19:50 am by Little John »
May all of your moments afield with bow in hand please and satisfy you.            G. Fred Asbell

Offline zeNBowyer

  • Member
  • Posts: 649
Re: My first modified Holmegaard
« Reply #16 on: September 30, 2009, 12:15:19 am »
"Nice job on that Holmy"

    Can  it  be  happening,  ebonics  has  hit  primitive  Archer ~
"There's  something  immoral  about  abandoning  your  own  judgement"
Cowards always run in  packs
Ishi did not become the arrow, I suspect. The arrow became Ishi.

nickf

  • Guest
Re: My first modified Holmegaard
« Reply #17 on: September 30, 2009, 05:24:01 pm »
wtf zenbowyer?

wannabe

  • Guest
Re: My first modified Holmegaard
« Reply #18 on: November 20, 2009, 12:52:48 am »
Just Chronographed the modified Holmegaard, 139fps with graphite arrows fletched for a tip away arrow rest. The holmegaard has no arrow rest. The archery specialist told me to add at least 5 fps to this. So, is 144fps  a good arrow speed? I checked TBB4 p 110 for the MOJAM bow test data. 139-144 fps is in the bottom quarter of the list. But since I have no experience with this kind of measurement I'm just looking for comments.

Offline Del the cat

  • Member
  • Posts: 8,288
    • Derek Hutchison Native Wood Self Bows
Re: My first modified Holmegaard
« Reply #19 on: November 20, 2009, 04:27:31 am »
none of the othere make sense.
Are you sure you are not confusing bows with women?
Del
Health warning, these posts may contain traces of nut.

Offline Hrothgar

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,475
Re: My first modified Holmegaard
« Reply #20 on: November 20, 2009, 10:00:44 am »
Joe, for your first holmie, and using a pretty crooked stave, you have done a very good job-- follows the grain, string lays straight down the limbs, pulls 60# @28" w/o breaking.  I'd call it a success and show it off. Eric
" To be, or not to be"...decisions, decisions, decisions.

Offline NOMADIC PIRATE

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,910
Re: My first modified Holmegaard
« Reply #21 on: November 20, 2009, 11:56:54 am »
That's funny, the archery specialist sayd that you'll gain 5 fps with a rest  :D
NORTH SHORE, HAWAII

Offline Kegan

  • Member
  • Posts: 2,676
Re: My first modified Holmegaard
« Reply #22 on: November 21, 2009, 04:52:55 pm »
Just Chronographed the modified Holmegaard, 139fps with graphite arrows fletched for a tip away arrow rest. The holmegaard has no arrow rest. The archery specialist told me to add at least 5 fps to this. So, is 144fps  a good arrow speed? I checked TBB4 p 110 for the MOJAM bow test data. 139-144 fps is in the bottom quarter of the list. But since I have no experience with this kind of measurement I'm just looking for comments.

Nice bow! And you'll get better. You can't expect to build a top-notch bow right from the beginning, where's the fun in that ;D?

wannabe

  • Guest
Re: My first modified Holmegaard
« Reply #23 on: November 22, 2009, 11:31:56 pm »
That's funny, the archery specialist sayd that you'll gain 5 fps with a rest  :D

No, he meant that the arrows were fletched incorrectly for my bow and that one of the feathers would hit against the bow rather severely upon release.