Swampman I don't trust photos much when it comes to small differences. I think you know better holding it in your hands, looking at it all over, knowing its history, and irregularities, and shooting the thing.
If the wood was perfect, and identical limb to limb, the angle of the camera perfect, the camera itself not suffering from spherical aberration, barrel distortion, image centered, the lighting perfect, your hand in the exact centers of pressure at the bow and string, you didn't favor a positive tiller, any heat treatments were perfectly symmetrical, etc,.etc. then maybe the limbs would be mirror images of each other and bend at the exact same rates, and that would even show up in a photo.
And I also believe that what looks like perfect even tiller in a photo, might not shoot as well as it could in real life, or even look that way to a real observer, or in a mirror. This is all not to say not to use every tool you want to get a bow looking right, but when it comes right down to it, I would trust your instincts and your eyes and hands, because I can promise you from experience, it's possible to tiller something that shoots good and feels good to death by trying to follow a single photo. Not trying to argue anything at all here, but just trying to encourage with a plug for instinct and feel.
