You can also use duplex points with wood or shoot shafts. They might be more durable than the socketed glue-on if you sinew wrap or similar.
I guess the primitive alternative would be a foreshafty thing for a target point, out of a dense wood, bone or antler.
Why tanged (duplex nail) points may be more durable than standard glue-on, quoted from Peter Dekker
I've often heard that people think the socketed arrow is the better option against armor. Has this ever been tested? I shoot both types of arrows and if I shoot a socketed arrow into a wall it is prone to breakage right behind the socket. My tanged arrows remain intact if shot into the same brick wall. I've split small stones with them. The tang, hide glue and tight sinew wrapping are more work but much stronger than a [socketed] construction. The steel tang also stiffens and reinforces the frontal portion of the arrow. I see no reason why a socketed head would be better for armor penetration.
...
The base of the head that rests against the shaft needs to be flat [have a shoulder, which the duplex nail points do] so it supports the shaft on impact instead of splitting it.
cons are, more work to put on and remove than glue on.
I used top hat screw on points once, on bamboo arrows. They recommend their own specialized tool... I just used pliers. Sometimes they broke off or got lost. maybe because I didn't do it 'right' - besides, the thickness of the bamboo was a bit inconsistent. May be easier to do glue ons - taper, clean up and glue with good hot melt... Besides, they tend to be cheaper from what I've seen.