Author Topic: How bad can grain be on a belly lamination?  (Read 5431 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Acheulean

  • Guest
How bad can grain be on a belly lamination?
« on: November 27, 2017, 06:08:30 pm »
If I use a 1/8" strip of straight-grained wood as a backing, how bad can the grain be on the wood that I use for the belly?

Offline PEARL DRUMS

  • Member
  • Posts: 14,079
  • }}}--CK-->
Re: How bad can grain be on a belly lamination?
« Reply #1 on: November 27, 2017, 07:40:22 pm »
I look for the same quality grain on the belly as I do the back. 
Only when the last tree has died and the last river has been poisoned and the last fish has been caught will we realize we cannot eat money.

Acheulean

  • Guest
Re: How bad can grain be on a belly lamination?
« Reply #2 on: November 27, 2017, 08:56:40 pm »
Then what would be the point of applying a backing? I suppose you could Perry reflex, but I don't think that's why most folks back their bows. I think most are concerned about getting bonked.

So, how bad can the belly be before it's not even worth backing?

Offline willie

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,178
Re: How bad can grain be on a belly lamination?
« Reply #3 on: November 27, 2017, 09:05:43 pm »
of course pd has a point that we try to use the best possible, but using a backing often presupposes the bow wood is not quite up to snuff for a back but can still be used for the rest of the bow.
"bad grain" can mean a lot of things,  straight grain with lots of earlywood may not be suitable for a belly, but wood swirls around small tight knots may work ok if the wood is dense and otherwise sound.
do you have a pic? or a better description of what you are trying to work with?

Acheulean

  • Guest
Re: How bad can grain be on a belly lamination?
« Reply #4 on: November 27, 2017, 09:32:26 pm »
Willie, this isn't for a particular project. I'd just like to know what you can safely get away with. Most of my bows are from boards, and there are simply more options available if I can slap a backing on a questionable piece of wood.

Offline Ballasted_Bowyer

  • Member
  • Posts: 62
Re: How bad can grain be on a belly lamination?
« Reply #5 on: November 27, 2017, 09:50:50 pm »
Choose a strait-grained board and try to keep at least one growth ring the whole length of the belly. The wild spots in the compression wood are more prone to crushing. Wood is strongest when the force is applied to the end of the fiber. Think like the wood is a bundle of straws glued together with hot glue. It won't support much force except in the direction where the straws and not the glue is stressed. Try to keep the modulus of elasticity of each material balanced with the amount it has to stretch or compress so the backing doesn't explode or compress the belly. If the backing has a low modulus of elasticity, it can be thicker. If it has a high modular of elasticity it must be thinner. For example, if your backing is moso bamboo and your belly is ipe, thickness ratio should be 50/50 or less. However, if it is moso bamboo/ maple, make the bamboo as thin as possible and it might still be too thick.
Acts 10:12-13  "It contained all kinds of four-footed animals, as well as reptiles and birds. Then a voice told him, 'Get up, Peter. Kill and eat.'"

Offline willie

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,178
Re: How bad can grain be on a belly lamination?
« Reply #6 on: November 27, 2017, 09:59:09 pm »
that hard to quantify without  an example, but after you have lost some labor backing and tillering bows that break, you will have a better feel for what you can get away with. certainly high strain designs call for better materiel and there is a point where a core is not suitable for the shear stresses involved. reviewing some pics of "why did my bow break" autopsy  threads might help, as well as some chapters in TBB series.

Offline Hamish

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,473
Re: How bad can grain be on a belly lamination?
« Reply #7 on: November 28, 2017, 04:15:01 am »
 I don't use a 1:16 ratio like I do with backings(though I probably should). I mainly do it by eye. Nevertheless I still try to use the straightest grained stock that I can find.
It is very important to use straight grained stock with an English Longbow. Not as  much the grain on the side, but the grain across the belly is absolutely critical.

I had a nice hickory backed, tri lam stave. I had it on a tillering board with a loose string. Then at low brace. When I tried to brace it to full height, it blew. The grain across the belly was probably only 4 " from one side to the other, where it broke. Add to that a cambered belly and there really wasn't much holding it together. The backing was a champ and still held together undamaged but the belly fractured, and continued up through the core as well.
With a wider flatbow it isn't as critical, but once again use the straightest stuff you can get your hands on. If it looks too iffy it probably is.
 
All I know is if you use straight grained wood you won't have any issues.


Offline Del the cat

  • Member
  • Posts: 8,291
    • Derek Hutchison Native Wood Self Bows
Re: How bad can grain be on a belly lamination?
« Reply #8 on: November 28, 2017, 04:36:40 am »
The belly of a bow can be made from a series of blocks butt joined together with no glue and still work! :o
The compression will hold them together.
It's knots and faults that will fail in compression that will cause problems.
Del
Health warning, these posts may contain traces of nut.

Offline PEARL DRUMS

  • Member
  • Posts: 14,079
  • }}}--CK-->
Re: How bad can grain be on a belly lamination?
« Reply #9 on: November 28, 2017, 07:21:48 am »
Poor belly grain can make an otherwise straight bow twist at brace and it can compress and fracture on angular grain lines. I've seen both firsthand. Is it a sure thing? No, but the longer I do this stuff the less I like to play games with the materials I use.

Del, Id like to see that done and the tiller it offers. Not sure your going to get a sooth inside bend on a square butt joint. Something has to separate for a butt joint to bend.
Only when the last tree has died and the last river has been poisoned and the last fish has been caught will we realize we cannot eat money.

Offline bushboy

  • Member
  • Posts: 2,256
Re: How bad can grain be on a belly lamination?
« Reply #10 on: November 28, 2017, 08:30:01 am »
This is bamboo backed osage,from about 8 years ago,very bad grain.tiller was decent
Some like motorboats,I like kayaks,some like guns,I like bows,but not the wheelie type.

Offline Pat B

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 37,496
Re: How bad can grain be on a belly lamination?
« Reply #11 on: November 28, 2017, 08:54:23 am »
I only back bows that need to be backed unless I'm planning to make a backed bow. I would never back a sound bow stave with a hard backing. If I plan to make a R/D or Perry reflexed bow with a board stave I want it to be the best backing and belly I can use with the backing appropriate for the belly.
 Over the years I've used bad bellies(big knots or unruly grain) and bad backings(grain violations and run offs) and have been fortunate to have success with most. After years of experimentation I've come to the conclusion that it's just not worth the effort to work with iffy materials.
 If you have a good tree stave it generally wouldn't need a backing, the back and belly are appropriate for each other or they can easily be made that way by trapping one way or the other. I've only made a few unbacked board bows because I just don't trust a sawed board. Even brown grocery bag paper is sufficient to help keep a splinter from lifting so a backing doesn't have to be complicated but I try to only use the best materials I can find if I'm going to put the effort into building a bow. A backing won't necessarily make a bad belly safe.
Make the most of all that comes and the least of all that goes!    Pat Brennan  Brevard, NC

Offline Del the cat

  • Member
  • Posts: 8,291
    • Derek Hutchison Native Wood Self Bows
Re: How bad can grain be on a belly lamination?
« Reply #12 on: November 28, 2017, 10:03:20 am »
Poor belly grain can make an otherwise straight bow twist at brace and it can compress and fracture on angular grain lines. I've seen both firsthand. Is it a sure thing? No, but the longer I do this stuff the less I like to play games with the materials I use.

Del, Id like to see that done and the tiller it offers. Not sure your going to get a sooth inside bend on a square butt joint. Something has to separate for a butt joint to bend.
yeah, I'm with you on the twisty grain. I think I've seen youtube vids of balista type machines with blocks on the belly or some such.
I had a Yew bow that I was reviving, pulling out the set and heat treating. I overdid it and it cracked right across the belly to about half the thickness of the bow >:(. I was about to give up on it but thought I'd give it a chance. So I strung it, put it on the tiller and took it right back to full draw :o... no problem! So having survived that I thought I'd patch the belly. The bow is still going strong.
I was really just trying to say that not all "problems" are actually problems. I s'pose it's down to the individual bit of wood, faluts that run across or along the bow prob aren't so bad, it's the diagonal stuff that get you :)
Del
Health warning, these posts may contain traces of nut.

Acheulean

  • Guest
Re: How bad can grain be on a belly lamination?
« Reply #13 on: November 28, 2017, 12:04:58 pm »
Quote
The belly of a bow can be made from a series of blocks butt joined together with no glue and still work! :o
The compression will hold them together.
It's knots and faults that will fail in compression that will cause problems.
Del

Thanks Del, that's what I was looking for. I won't be butt joining anything together, but the idea that you could tells me something.
And, I'll be sure to avoid all of those beautiful knot-riddled eastern red cedar boards that all the lumber yards are peddling.

Acheulean

  • Guest
Re: How bad can grain be on a belly lamination?
« Reply #14 on: November 28, 2017, 12:19:25 pm »
Quote
All I know is if you use straight grained wood you won't have any issues.

That's not true.