When the tillering goal is no set

[willie]

Zero set is the tillering goal. 

What do you look for during the tillering process to see if you are pushing the wood too hard?  Before the set happens.

[Pat B]

Set early on in the tillering process.

[Hamish]

I don't look for anything, to stop set during tillering, other than the basics(no weak spots, limbs bending equally, not stressing the stave over the intended draw weight).
All the work is done during the design and layout, to ensure there is enough wood, either by length, or width to minimise set. Add low moisture content, and possibly a heat treatment of the belly, and reflexing. Just make sure you stack the odds in your favor beforehand.

If you still get more set than you wanted, modify the design of the next one, until you achieve the results you want.

[willie]

the basics  (no weak spots, limbs bending equally, not stressing the stave over the intended draw weight). 
Add low moisture content, and possibly a heat treatment of the belly

the basics surely are a priority.  Lets assume an experienced tillerer at work with good osage with a design that just asks too much for the wood.
Does anyone frequently unstring and monitor how fast the stave returns to straight?

If you still get more set than you wanted, modify the design of the next one, until you achieve the results you want.
All the work is done during the design and layout, to ensure there is enough wood, either by length, or width to minimise set.

Of course, if only there were a bigger supply of good osage staves waiting in the corner.

[bassman211]

Length, width, thickness, and belly heat, and being familiar with the wood you are working with, and slow careful tillering. We all know that, but it is worth repeating.

[Eric Krewson]

To me it is mostly the quality of the wood you use, I have said before there is osage and then there is OSAGE, the latter being vastly different from the run of the mill stuff, heavy, very hard and cuts like butter with a drawknife with no splintering.

I have several bows that I made from this kind of wood 20 years ago that never developed any set at all.

Almost all of my bows develop some minor set over time and with countless thousands of arrows through them, I think this is inevitable and no big deal.

[Selfbowman]

At what point does set start coming in for most of you ?? For me about20”. If we was to build a bow never drawn over 20” would it most likely not take set? If I was to design a bow that draws 50# @20” inches would it be more likely not to take set??? Now in flight for example if you had more early draw and less draw length could it cast an arrow farther because it had more stored energy even though the draw length was shortened?

[superdav95]

At what point does set start coming in for most of you ?? For me about20”. If we was to build a bow never drawn over 20” would it most likely not take set? If I was to design a bow that draws 50# @20” inches would it be more likely not to take set??? Now in flight for example if you had more early draw and less draw length could it cast an arrow farther because it had more stored energy even though the draw length was shortened?

Good question.  I wonder if what you are describing is more like an old style crossbow.  Shorter draw but heavy early draw.   I also notice set start to take place on my pyramid style bows and long bow at the 20” draw point. 

[superdav95]

Zero set is the tillering goal. 

What do you look for during the tillering process to see if you are pushing the wood too hard?  Before the set happens.

I like to creep up on it doing the basics like others have said.  Design, layout, moisture content, and most importantly wood selection quality.  Avoiding early mistakes in process will minimize set but wood quality makes the difference like Eric said I believe also.  That being said, Inexperience with top quality OSAGE can also take set.   

[willie]

I like to creep up on it doing the basics....... 
Avoiding early mistakes.......

Early mistakes are easier to see in simple bends.
When the limb has more complex shapes, ie deflex recurve/reflex or uneven limbs, The bowyer seeing the bends look even or consistent doesnt neccesarily mean the stresses are'nt getting to high someplace. Should a highly stressed area show set, well then we know, but I am hoping to find a way to see it coming before the set occurs.

How often have you lost alot of that nice "early draw" weight that makes for high string tension at brace, before set becomes apparent?

[superdav95]

I like to creep up on it doing the basics....... 
Avoiding early mistakes.......

Early mistakes are easier to see in simple bends.
When the limb has more complex shapes, ie deflex recurve/reflex or uneven limbs, The bowyer seeing the bends look even or consistent doesnt neccesarily mean the stresses are'nt getting to high someplace. Should a highly stressed area show set, well then we know, but I am hoping to find a way to see it coming before the set occurs.

How often have you lost alot of that nice "early draw" weight that makes for high string tension at brace, before set becomes apparent?

you are right willie.  more complex builds change things a bit.  Especially with an unbraced profile that is filled with character for example would be more of a challenge for sure and this is where experience kicks in. The best way to get that experience is to build lots of bows and not be afraid to break them testing the limits an get a feel for it as well as an eye for good tiller.  as an aside here i recently have been learning a lot more then previously thought about bamboo for bows and how to better tiller them.  The lesson here for me is I guess we should never settle and always strive for better and possible new ways that may be an improvement albeit minor to what we have been doing.  I came into bowmaking with no prior knowledge of working with wood or bending it.  I had no pre conceived ideas or expectations.  A buddy of mine made bows and I tried to trade hime a custome knife for one of his bows.  I was surprised when he said no and said why dont you just make your own bow?  Ive not looked back and still love it.  There have been many one here and elsewhere that have helped me over hurdles that came up on various builds and learned a ton from this community.  I do try to give back where I can to those i can.  Wille you asked how i creep up on it on my builds and I would say that the yardstick method works well for me.  I built my trade bow this year out of a very wonky yew stave that needed some taming.  This bow went to Will B and it shot well and took very little set if any.  I used the yard stick method on this build early on to get me to good clean brace. Once there i knew i was headed in a good way with this bow.  I also paid very close attention to all the dips and hills and twists on the back to match them on the belly.  I had a large cluster area of harder pin knots that had to be accounted for also as they dont bend the same as regular wood.  I considered this bow a challenge and a joy to build and glad it went to Will.  The yardstick method bassically takes overall bend of each limb independently for consistent bend and then comparing them with each other. using the straight edge of the yardstick laid accross the belly of the bow while bent to get a good view of the bend early on has helped me creep up on it.  it dosent have to be a board bow either.  Ive done this with character builds just fine and works especially well.   I now use this method with my boo builds too.  hope this answers your question Willie.

[willie]

thanks for taking the time to share, Dave.

I have been searching through some older posts that Steve (Badger) posted a while back. He developed what he called "no set tillering", and I even tried it a few times with some moderate success. Like most methods, there are judgements to make about how much and when. Perhaps I should do some test tillering to quantify just how much to back off my draweight goals when the method dictates.

http://www.primitivearcher.com/smf/index.php/topic,61588.0.html